Dating methods are derived from 3 unprovable and assumptions that are questionable

Dating methods are derived from 3 unprovable and assumptions that are questionable

1) That the price of decay happens to be constant throughout time. 2). That the isotope abundances within the specimen dated haven’t been changed during its history by addition or elimination of either moms and dad or child isotopes 3) that after the stone first formed it included a known amount of child product (“Radioisotopes and also the age of the planet earth” pg v)

We should observe that processes that are past never be occurring after all today, and that some could have happened at prices and intensities far not the same as comparable procedures today. ( “Radioisotopes in addition to chronilogical age of the planet earth” pg vii)

Jesus cursed the floor (the stones too!)

See my commentary on Genesis 3 verse 17 “..cursed could be the ground for the benefit”

Whenever this took place there was clearly a burst of radioactity that made the rocks look avove the age of these people were.

Would not this make most of the stones appear the age that is same?

“The stone real question is quite simple and contains regarding the elements that are basic comprised these stones at the beginning. Whenever all these elements, uranium, potassium, radium etc. were started up, it could simply be normal in order for them to act based on their properties that are individual ultimately acquiring stable half-lives of decay, at various prices. Let’s imagine at first every radioactive element had been “exploded” into presence from pre-existent elements. None among these early faster half-lives is the identical to they truly are today.

As time progressed each would start to acquire its slow modern-day half-life that is stable but would each of them get these stable rates in a uniformity which will have them all in synchrony? Continue reading